find this story Trump on Epstein Questioning: “Time for the Country to Move On” After Claiming “Nothing Came Out About Me”

Donald Trump’s breezy dismissal, insisting the country should “get on with something else” now that “nothing came out” about him, is exactly the kind of rhetorical sleight of hand that has defined his public life. When confronted about Jeffrey Epstein, he didn’t just sidestep the question; he attempted to shut the door on it entirely, as if repetition of innocence is a substitute for scrutiny. 

His name appearing multiple times in Epstein‑related files is not a trivial detail, nor something the public is obliged to ignore simply because Trump declares the conversation over. If anything, his impatience with the topic only fuels suspicion.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by ALL ANGLES UK (@all_angles_uk)

The deeper issue is the political ecosystem that has allowed Trump to operate as though accountability is optional. He has cultivated an aura of invincibility, a belief that he can outpace any scandal through sheer force of personality and media saturation. 

LIVE RADIO

LISTEN NOW

Critics argue that his proximity to Epstein,  a man whose crimes are now synonymous with exploitation and abuse, warrants more than a dismissive shrug. Yet Trump behaves as though the rules that apply to everyone else simply don’t apply to him. Whether that’s denial, delusion, or a calculated understanding of his own political insulation is precisely what keeps this story alive.

What’s becoming increasingly clear is that Trump’s confidence isn’t accidental; it’s learned. He has survived controversies that would have ended the careers of most public figures, and he knows it. That survival has hardened into a kind of political armour, one that emboldens him to wave away legitimate questions with a smirk and a soundbite. But the Epstein files aren’t going anywhere, and neither is the public’s right to interrogate the powerful. 

LIVE RADIO

LISTEN NOW

Trump may believe he’s untouchable, but the more he insists the conversation should end, the more determined people become to keep asking whether accountability in modern politics is a principle or a privilege reserved for the few.