Shot entirely in Jamaica, the series delivers raw authenticity and a powerful showcase of local talent. Share The Sky series Possession has landed with a gravitational pull that’s hard to ignore, and audiences have wasted no time giving their stamp of approval — especially for its unapologetic embrace of Jamaican talent and culture. What makes this series truly seismic is not just its setting on the island, but the way it allows Jamaica to breathe, pulse and speak through its actors. This isn’t a backdrop; it’s a beating heart. And at the centre of that heartbeat are Sheldon Shepherd and Shantol Jackson, two Jamaican performers whose presence elevates the entire production. As one viewer put it online, “This is the first time I’ve seen Jamaica portrayed with this level of authenticity — absolutely gripping.” A commanding force in Jamaican cinema, Sheldon Shepherd has carved out a reputation for performances that feel volcanic in their emotional de...
Investigators assess whether inadequate supervision or organisational failings enabled the near‑fatal attack.
A three‑year‑old boy is clinging to life in a Cambridge hospital after being thrown into a crocodile enclosure , an act so violent, so incomprehensible, that it has shaken the country. The suspect, a 30‑year‑old man with learning disabilities, was arrested at the scene but deemed unfit for interview. Police are treating the incident as attempted murder. The child, pulled from the water after being mauled, remains in a critical but stable condition.
But as the criminal investigation unfolds, another urgent question is emerging: how did a vulnerable adult, reportedly accompanied by carers, manage to carry out an act this catastrophic? And if he was under supervision, who — or what — failed?
Speaking with our health and lifestyle contributor, she warns that the stakes in a case like this are enormous. When safeguarding collapses, the consequences ripple far beyond the immediate horror of the incident.
She explains that in the UK, anyone working in regulated care, whether supporting vulnerable adults or children , must have an enhanced DBS check. If a person is barred, they are legally prohibited from working in care. Organisations have a statutory duty to ensure staff are vetted, trained, supervised, and risk‑assessed. If a vulnerable adult requires constant supervision, that supervision must be real, continuous, and competent.
Which leads to the questions now dominating safeguarding circles: how many carers were present? Were they trained? Were they watching him? Were risk assessments in place? And if his disabilities were severe enough to require close monitoring, why was he ever in a position to harm a child?
Individual liability— carers may face disciplinary action, dismissal, or referral to the DBS if they failed in their duty of care.
Organisational liability — employers, agencies, or care providers may face regulatory investigation, civil claims, or even criminal scrutiny if systemic failings are identified.
DBS referrals — if a carer’s actions or inaction placed a child at risk, the organisation is legally obliged to refer them to the DBS for potential barring.
Safeguarding reviews — local authorities may launch a Child Safeguarding Practice Review to examine what went wrong and whether the incident was preventable.
These are not theoretical possibilities. They are legal realities.
And they matter because this case is not simply about one man’s actions. It is about the systems surrounding him, systems that exist precisely to prevent tragedies like this.
If the suspect was under the supervision of one or two carers, investigators will now be scrutinising every minute leading up to the incident. Were carers distracted? Under‑trained? Over‑stretched? Did the organisation responsible for his care follow its own policies? Did it conduct risk assessments before taking him to a public venue with dangerous animals? Did it ensure adequate staffing levels?
Ready to level up your income?
Join Avon UK and build a beauty business that moves with your lifestyle. JOIN NOW
If the answer to any of these questions is “no”, the consequences could be severe.
Meanwhile, a family is living through every parent’s nightmare. Their three‑year‑old child was thrown into a crocodile pit, a fall of up to 15 feet, and attacked before a heroic zookeeper intervened. The trauma is unimaginable.
This case is now a test of Britain’s safeguarding framework. It exposes the fragile intersection between disability support, public safety, and organisational responsibility. It forces the country to confront a painful truth: safeguarding is only as strong as the people and systems enforcing it. And when those systems fail, the consequences are devastating.
